Just realised that this same image of Keira Knightley has been regurgitated across Marie Claire magazines worldwide - and not even in a wide space of time. This picture of our English Rose was first seen on the September issue for the Ukraine, Australia and the Netherlands. This begs the question: just how broke ARE Marie Claire?
We know magazines of the same title and sometimes even publishing company use the same images and alter them slightly or at least put them on a different background, but this is taking image distribution to a new level, isn't it? Are MC really that stumped for cover stars? We know this isn't the first time they have re-printed a cover, but at least give it a few months between each release, yeah Marie Claire?
If we're being brutally honest, the cover isn't that amazing to warrant multiple distribution. Sure, it's a nice, pretty picture of Keira Knightley but that's all it is. Plus - note the "update your look" irony…
No comments:
Post a Comment